Philippines climbs in property rights ranking

The Philippines went up a notch to 83^rd out of 126 countries in the 2025 International Property Rights Index (IPRI) by think tank Property Rights Alliance.

Out of 10, the country scored 4.276, below the global average of 5.131 and remained the lowest among its peers in the East and Southeast Asian region.

The index measures property rights using three pillars: legal and political environment, physical property rights, and intellectual property rights.

The Philippines went up a notch to 83^rd out of 126 countries in the 2025 International Property Rights Index (IPRI)

Source: Business World

‘Philippines sitting on $3.9 trillion hydropower potential’

The Philippines holds around $3.9 trillion in hydropower potential, which, according to industry experts, would not only boost electricity supply but also curb worsening floods and enhance farm productivity.

“The estimate is around 650 gigawatts of (untapped potential) because we’re an archipelago and we’re surrounded by water,” said Gertrude Roque, president of the private sector-backed Philhydro Association Inc.

To unlock this vast potential, Roque said the country would need an investment of roughly $5 million to $6 million per megawatt.

“But of course, not all sites are accessible. Road openings, as we call them – especially in mountainous areas – are very difficult, costly and risky,” she said.

While several hydro technologies exist, including run-of-river (ROR), dams and pumped storage hydro (PSH), Gertrude said developing a combination of these would be the “best” approach for the Philippines.

“For dams, we store the water to prevent floods or to irrigate the farms,” Roque said, highlighting the function of dams besides electricity generation.

Large-scale hydro plants often typically require the construction of dams that create reservoirs, allowing water to be stored and released in a controlled way to generate electricity.

ROR facilities are small-scale hydro plants that rely on the flow of the rivers, while PSH can function as an energy storage while also injecting power into the grid to reinforce supply.

“We really need to look into the capacities that we need to build for each type of these hydro projects. We have to balance, plan for it and do a lot of studies and scenario building for that. That’s how flexible, I guess, hydro is,” Roque said.

Energy Secretary Sharon Garin, meanwhile, described hydropower projects as the “perfect partner” in the country’s transition to cleaner, sustainable energy.

“We rely on hydropower for reliability and stability. It provides the crucial firming capacity and the essential ancillary services required to keep our grid stable 24/7,” Garin said.

Amid the country’s persistent flooding problems, the energy chief also affirmed that hydropower could help drive national resilience and flood control.

“Hydro facilities are critical infrastructure for disaster mitigation. Reservoirs and integrated water management actively control river flows, mitigate flash floods and protect communities during severe weather events,” Garin said.

Currently, hydropower accounts for around eight percent of the country’s energy mix.

Source: Philstar

Moving Forward: How the Philippines Can Unlock Health, Mobility & Climate Wins by Walking and Cycling

In many Philippine cities and towns, we see clogged roads, increasing vehicle ownership, traffic congestion, air pollution, and rising chronic health problems such as obesity and cardiovascular disease. At the same time, the country is highly vulnerable to climate change: sea‑level rise, typhoons, and the need to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are real concerns. So there is a strong case for tackling mobility, health, and climate together. A recent global study (published in PNAS) shows that investing in walking and cycling infrastructure is one of those rare “triple‑win” strategies.

source: Scientific American Dec 2025

What the study found and why it matters for the Philippines

The global research shows that when cities are designed so that people can walk or cycle safely and conveniently, the benefits are huge.

Key findings:

• Higher population density → shorter trips → more walking/cycling.

• More extensive and better bicycle lane networks → meaningful uptick in cycling rates.

• Even climates with hot summers or cold winters are no barrier — what matters is the infrastructure and design.

• If all cities matched Copenhagen’s cycling network extent, global emissions from private vehicles could drop ~6%, and the health benefits would be in the hundreds of billions of dollars annually.

For the Philippines:

• Many urban areas (e.g., metro Manila, Cebu, Davao, etc.) already have high densities and many short trips. This is an advantage.

• If we bolster walking/cycling infrastructure (bike lanes, pedestrian‑friendly streets, mixed‐use neighborhoods) we can tap into latent potential for active mobility.

• Reducing vehicle dependency helps reduce congestion, air pollution (which affects health), and transport emissions (which matter for climate commitments).

• Health gains from active travel (more walking/cycling) include reduced risk of chronic disease, improved wellbeing and reduced health system burdens.

Specific Opportunities & Considerations for the Philippines

1. Urban planning & mixed‐use development In many Philippine cities, residential areas and workplaces/shopping/amenities may be separated, so short trips get done by vehicle or motorcycle. Encouraging mixed‐use development (homes, shops, offices closer together) helps make walking/cycling feasible.

2. Safe, continuous infrastructure for active travel Simply having a painted bike lane is not enough. The global study emphasized street‐design: separation from vehicle traffic, safe crossings, comfort for walkers/cyclists. In the Philippines, many sidewalks are discontinuous, obstructed, or absent; many bike lanes are fragmented or share space with vehicles. Upgrading these can raise walking/cycling rates.

3. Contextual fit & local culture The study shows: you don’t have to replicate Copenhagen exactly to succeed. What matters is tailoring to local conditions — topography, climate, culture, travel habits. For the Philippines, for example, around‑the‑year warm/humid climate is the norm, so shade, green corridors, rain protection might matter more. Hilly terrain or informal settlement patterns may present challenges.

4. Equity and inclusion Many Filipinos rely on walking and cycling out of necessity (not choice). Infrastructure upgrades must consider low‑income neighborhoods, safe access for women, children, elderly. Also linking active travel with public transit is key (so you can walk/cycle to the bus/train station).

5. Health and climate co‑benefits

   • Health: more walking/cycling → more physical activity → fewer chronic diseases, lower health system costs, improved quality of life.

   • Climate & emissions: lower reliance on private motor vehicles → fewer GHG emissions. This helps the Philippines meet its climate goals and reduces vulnerability from transport‑related air pollution.

   • Resilience & efficiency: A diversified mobility system that includes walking/cycling is more resilient (less dependent on fuel, less vulnerable to traffic jams) and more space‐efficient (less land used for parking, roads).

A Few Action Steps for Local Government & Communities

• Conduct a mobility audit: identify neighborhoods with high short‑trip potential (schools, workplaces, shops within 1‑3 km) and lacking safe walking/cycling infrastructure.

• Prioritize pedestrian first: wide continuous sidewalks, safe crossings, shade trees, lighting.

• Expand and connect bike lane networks: ensure continuity, safe intersections, visibility, and links to transit hubs and workplaces.

• Promote mixed‐use zoning and local amenities so shorter trips become practical.

• Launch behavioral campaigns: encourage walking/cycling by showing benefits, safety tips, community‑rides, walking groups.

• Measure and monitor progress: track mode‑share of walking/cycling, infrastructure length, safety outcomes, health metrics.

• Secure funding: active‑travel infrastructure tends to deliver strong cost‑benefit (health + environment) so build the business case for local budgeting or donor funding.

Why This Matters Now

The Philippines is at a critical juncture: urbanization is increasing, vehicle fleets are growing, climate change risks are mounting, and public health burdens are rising. Investing in walking and cycling isn’t just an “add‐on” — it’s a strategic investment in sustainable mobility, healthier citizens, and lower emissions. The global study gives strong evidence: the infrastructure choices we make today will shape health and climate outcomes for decades.

Conclusion

If the Philippines can shift more mobility toward walking and cycling — by density‐friendly development, robust infrastructure, and inclusive design — we stand to gain on multiple fronts: better health, less traffic stress, cleaner air, fewer emissions, more livable cities. The roadmap is there; what we need now is the will, the planning, and the action.

millard-ball-et-al-2025-global-health-and-climate-benefits-from-walking-and-cycling-infras.

Download • 2.81MB

Source: Ziggurat Real Estate