Land-area minimums imposed for pharma economic zones

The Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) said pharmaceutical economic zones (pharma zones) must be built on sites with an area of at least 10,000 square meters (sq.m.) in major cities.

According to PEZA Board Resolution No. 25-050, the minimum size applies to pharma the minimum contiguous land area for pharma zones in the National Capital Region (NCR) and other metropolitan areas.

The minimum land requirement for pharma zones outside the NCR and other metropolitan areas is 50,000 sq.m.

“The release of the guidelines provides clear direction on the establishment of pharma zones,” PEZA Director General Tereso O. Panga said.

“These zones are expected to attract substantial pharma, medical, and healthcare-related investments, advanced technology, and increase local production and research — creating numerous jobs and enhancing the country’s export potential — positioning the Philippines as a competitive player in the global pharmaceutical market,” he added.

According to the investment promotion agency, the board approved the guidelines in a meeting late last month.

“The move was in response to the directives of President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. to make medicines more accessible to the Filipino people and to encourage more local producers to boost their R&D and manufacturing capabilities and lower drug costs for the general public,” PEZA said.

Aside from the land area requirements, the guidelines also outlined the preferred investments that can be registered with PEZA to avail of incentives on offer for pharma zones.

These activities include research, development, and manufacturing of medical drugs and devices, active ingredients, biologicals, vaccines, in vitro diagnostic reagents, and radiation-emitting devices or equipment.

“This shall include activities related to raw materials, packaging materials, and other pharmaceuticals, medical devices, or health products as may be certified by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration),” according to the resolution.

It added that the “pharma zone registered business enterprise (RBE) shall efficiently operate and contribute to the development of the preferred area in particular and of the national economy in general.”

Under Title XIII of the Tax Code, fiscal incentives that pharma zone RBEs are eligible for include income tax holidays, special corporate income tax, and enhanced deductions regimes, among others.

Aside from the fiscal incentives, the RBEs can also employ foreign nationals in executive, supervisory, or advisory positions, with PEZA visas allowing multiple entry issued to non-resident foreign nationals and their qualified dependents.

They can also enjoy streamlined processing of applications for environmental compliance certificates and applications for permits, licenses, or certifications, and simplified customs procedures.

However, the resolution clarified that partially developed or existing economic zones, facilities, and existing RBEs are not entitled to the incentives.

Source: Business World

From grey list to green light

From being blacklisted in 2000 to greylisted in 2021, the Philippines has made significant strides in its battle against financial crimes. In a remarkable turnaround, the country has now reached a pivotal milestone: removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) monitoring list.

This achievement was announced on Feb. 21, 2025, marking a new chapter in the Philippines' commitment to financial integrity and global security. The country's journey through the FATF listings has been challenging, marked by cycles of blacklisting and grey-listing.

Initially blacklisted in the early 2000s due to the absence of a strong Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (AML/CTF) legal framework, the Philippines took its first step toward reform with the pas-sage of Republic Act 9160, also known as the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001.

This led to the country's removal from the blacklist in 2005. However, achieving full compliance was still challenging. Between 2008 and 2021, the country's listing status varied, often due to concerns about counter-terrorist financing laws and other regulatory gaps.

Despite these challenges, the Philippines showed resilience. In response to its 2021 greylisting, the country implemented a comprehensive action plan to address key AML/CFT deficiencies. It involved strengthening supervision of designated nonfinancial businesses and professions, cracking down on illegal money transfers, improving law enforcement's access to beneficial ownership information and safeguarding nonprofit organizations from misuse.

The collaborative efforts have led to the Philippines' removal from the greylist, highlighting the country's commitment, through the Anti-Money Laundering Council, to combating financial crimes and strengthening global financial security.

It must be emphasized that the Philippines' removal from the FATF greylist is more than just a symbolic victory. It signifies an exceptional strengthening of the country's financial system. For businesses and financial institutions, this development brings immediate and tangible benefits.

One of the most notable advantages is the reduction in the need for enhanced due diligence on cross-border transactions, which not only lowers operational costs but also streamlines processes. Moreover, the easing of reporting requirements also reduces administrative tasks, allowing entities to use resources more efficiently.

This makes the country's financial system more attractive to international investors, enhancing the Philip-pines' competitiveness. This shift is especially significant given the well-documented negative effects of grey-listing: studies indicate that countries on the FATF greylist often experience a decline in gross domestic product (GDP), reduced foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and a lower FDI-to-GDP ratio.

For the Philippines, reversing these effects will pave the way for a more resilient and dynamic economy. Moreover, the removal from the greylist will help streamline and reduce the cost of remittance processing, providing direct benefits to overseas Filipino workers (OFWs).

With fewer regulatory hurdles and faster transaction times, OFWs will be able to send more of their hard-earned money back home, further improving their financial well-being. While the Philippines' removal from the FATF greylist is a remarkable feat, it is only the beginning of a long-term commitment to maintaining financial integrity.

To avoid future relisting, the country must keep enforcing strong measures to tackle emerging financial crime trends. Drawing from nearly 25 years of experience in exiting the FATF watch list and learnings from countries with strong, consistent AML/CFT frameworks — such as Australia, Canada and several EU nations — will be crucial.

This includes enacting forward-thinking legislation to stay ahead of emerging threats, reinforcing the enforcement and prosecution of financial crimes and conducting thorough national risk assessments to identify and address specific deficiencies.

Additionally, maintaining risk-based supervision across all sectors and fostering collaboration between the government and private sectors in implementing AML/CFT measures will be essential. Above all, maintaining strong political commitment to AML/CFT as a national priority will be crucial for protecting the country's financial system in the long term.

The key takeaway is that the Philippines' successful exit from the FATF greylist underscores the collective commitment of all stakeholders to maintaining a transparent financial system.

This achievement has boosted investor confidence and contributed to a more dynamic global market. How-ever, maintaining this success will require continuous compliance, proactive measures and the ability to adapt to emerging threats.

By doing so, the Philippines will ensure the long-term stability and resilience of its financial system.

Source: Manila Times

Filipino youth are optimistic for the future

More than four in five Filipino youth have a positive outlook for the next five years, according to a new collaborative study by Vero Advocacy and Kadence International. However, this optimism is tempered by a strong demand for urgent reforms in employment, education, and healthcare.

The study surveyed over 2,700 Gen Z and Millennials across six Southeast Asian countries, including 453 respondents from the Philippines. Vero Advocacy, a government relations arm, and Kadence International, a global market research agency, aim to explore the shared perspectives of these generations, uncovering their aspirations and challenges to help guide governments and the private sector in developing policies and initiatives that address current needs and drive long-term growth.

According to the survey, 43% of Gen Z Filipinos expect a “much better” future, and 42% anticipate a “better” life in the next five years – only slightly higher than the combined optimism rate of Millennial Filipinos, which stands at 84%. Overall, Filipino youth are more optimistic than their peers in Singapore (69%) and Malaysia (77%), with similar levels of hope for the future as young people in Indonesia (89%), Vietnam (89%), and Thailand (87%).

Both Gen Zs and Millennials in the Philippines, however, identified employment opportunities, quality education, and accessible healthcare as their top challenges. Though these issues are prevalent across the surveyed markets, satisfaction rates for these three areas of concern were the lowest among Filipino respondents. Other concerns include environmental protection, affordable housing, and effective taxation and resource management.

Employment opportunities – or the lack thereof – create uncertainty

Many young Filipinos feel uncertain about their professional futures, with 35% of Gen Z and Millennial respondents expressing a dissatisfaction over job security. Indeed, Filipino youth were the least satisfied with job security among the six countries surveyed, with a 29% satisfaction rate that lags far behind the second lowest satisfaction rate of 43% for Malaysia.

It comes as no surprise, then, that 31% of Gen Z Filipinos and 36% of Millennial Filipinos ranked employment opportunities as the top challenge they face, with most citing a lack of jobs as a key issue. For these young generations, securing a stable job is directly tied to achieving a stable life, as it ensures not just the ability to meet daily needs, but also long-term access to healthcare, housing, and further education.

To help address this issue, Filipino youth are calling for job creation programs and better employment services like career counseling and job placement schemes. These can provide students with the mentorship and opportunities they need to succeed in their chosen careers. Many also feel that additional training and education can help bridge the gap between workers and employers, helping young people align their skills with the evolving work landscape and establish sustainable careers.

High education costs education limit opportunities for Filipino youth

As with job security, Filipinos are the least satisfied with the cost of education in the region, with a satisfaction rate of 43% for Gen Z and 38% for Millennials.

Most respondents cited high costs as the main impediment to accessing quality education in the country, as families must contend with not just tuition, but also other school-related expenses like books, notebooks, uniforms, daily allowance, and special projects, school year after school year. The high cost of education is one of the main reasons why many young people forego secondary and tertiary education in the country, which further limits their employment opportunities and prevents them from building stable careers—and, by extension, a stable future.

Aside from cost, 31% of Gen Z and 30% of Millennial Filipinos cite the quality of education as the top challenge faced by the country. Many believe that the government should prioritize investments in educational facilities and technology, as well as enhanced professional development for educators. Gen Z Filipinos were more likely to indicate more support for students with special needs as something they would like to see in the future, while Millennial Filipinos raise the importance of regular review of and updates to school curricula to better prepare students for the future.

Healthcare access remains elusive for Filipino youth

Despite healthcare being a constitutional right, six out of ten Filipinos die without seeing a doctor, according to statistics from the Department of Health. Access to healthcare remains elusive for most Filipinos, with 10% of Filipino Gen Zs and 14% of Filipino Millennials citing it as the top challenge faced by the country.

Similar to employment opportunities and education costs, Philippine satisfaction rates for healthcare are the lowest in the regional survey, with only 36% of Filipino youth (39% of Gen Z and 34% of Millennials) saying they are satisfied with the current healthcare system in the country. 50% indicate that the high costs of healthcare services and treatments are a major challenge to accessing healthcare, while 25% point to the limited availability of facilities and equipment.

To improve the situation, survey respondents feel that the government must address issues of affordability, accessibility, and quality of healthcare services in the country.

Affordable housing options and better living conditions:

Young Southeast Asians, who are ushering in a new wave of urban mobility as they seek education and careers in major cities, dream of homes that offer comfort, security, and access to essential services, such as public transport, healthcare, and education. This is often tied to the broader goal of becoming financially independent and moving out of their family homes in the name of freedom, convenience, and personal growth.

All hands in: Recommendations for public policy and private initiatives

“As Southeast Asia’s youth are poised to drive the region’s future,” explained Pongsiri, Managing Partner at Vero Advocacy, “addressing these challenges is not just beneficial but essential for harnessing their full potential and ensuring a sustainable and inclusive economic growth.”

With its expertise in government relations in Southeast Asia, Vero Advocacy recognizes the essential link between youth, private stakeholders, and government. By understanding young people’s concerns, Vero Advocacy underscores the need for meaningful engagement and effective responses from governments and companies to create inclusive and sustainable policies and initiatives.

• Youth-Centric Policies – Governments should prioritize initiatives that guarantee access to quality education, expand job opportunities, and improve healthcare affordability and accessibility. By focusing on these areas, they can create a supportive environment for young people to thrive.

• Genuine Youth Engagement – It is crucial to involve young people in policy dialogues and decision-making processes. Their insights and perspectives should be actively sought, ensuring that their voices are both heard and valued in shaping policies that impact their future.

• Dedicated Spaces for Youth Advocacy – Establishing dedicated forums or platforms where youth can freely share their advocacy efforts is vital. These spaces should facilitate open dialogue, encourage innovative thinking, and provide opportunities for young individuals to highlight their contributions to national development.

• Support for Entrepreneurs – The private sector should develop entrepreneurial programs that leverage existing resources and expertise. By offering funding and training, businesses can nurture creativity and business acumen, empowering a new generation of innovators and leaders.

• Corporate Social Responsibility – Businesses should embed youth-centric goals into their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) strategies, focusing on initiatives that uplift communities and address social issues pertinent to young people. This alignment will foster a more inclusive approach to social development.

“With Gen Z and Millennials comprising over half of the Philippine population, it is critical for leaders and changemakers to listen to their needs,” said Gio Tingson, Youth Advocate and former Chairperson of the National Youth Commission. “Many of us often hear and repeat Dr. Jose Rizal’s statement about youth being the hope of the motherland. But while it is true that young people are eager to effect change, it is just as important for us to listen to them and empower them with the tools they need to succeed and build a future that is sustainable for all.”

Source: Adobo Mag