- Ziggurat Realestatecorp
- 4 days ago
- 3 min read
Business leaders in the Philippines are currently facing a critical gap. While most recognize the urgent need to adapt to the changing world of work, only a few believe that their organizations are responding effectively. The cost of inaction? A potential decline in productivity, trust, innovation and long-term resilience.
This insight comes from Deloitte’s 2025 Global Human Capital Trends study entitled “Unleashing Human Performance in a Boundaryless World,” which drew responses from over 13,000 voices across 93 countries, including 2,000 executives. Each year, the report offers a pulse check on how organizations are evolving and this year’s findings challenge leaders to rethink how they unlock human potential amid rising complexity.
The modern workplace isn’t about choosing sides — it’s about balancing tensions: automation vs augmentation, agility vs stability and control vs empowerment. These aren’t problems to solve, but they’re dynamics to design around. True human performance doesn’t ask leaders to choose between business and people, it asks them to build systems that serve both.
Deloitte has identified three dimensions of human performance: work, workforce and organization and culture. These three elements present key areas where organizations must make strategic choices to unlock both human and business outcomes.
The study presented the first dimension as rethinking work. Leaders around the world have overwhelmingly agreed that balancing stability and agility — or what Deloitte calls “stagility” — is essential in their operations. However, the challenges in achieving this are coming from the inside and not the outside. Internal blockers like outdated structures and varying leadership perspectives have hindered companies from focusing on what creates value rather than what just fills time.
To move forward, businesses must shift from task-based roles to outcome-driven work, meaning their focus should be on empowering employees to redesign their workflows using AI and embracing flexible, skill-based models that adapt to change.
Simplification is another blind spot. Globally, 41 percent of work time is spent on low-value tasks, but the rise of new technologies poses opportunities to eliminate low-value tasks. Tech and data can be used to identify inefficiencies, and redesign processes with employee input. The “slack” or freed up time from the integration of tech to systems should be embraced as this is not a waste but a space for creativity, which could be a game-changer for the organization.
The second dimension is evolving the workforce, coming from findings that highlight the widening of the experience gap. Filipino companies struggle to find experienced hires while new workers struggle to gain experience — especially as AI takes over many entry-level tasks. This leads to a development vacuum or the growing difference between the skills and experience organizations need and what workers actually have.
The fix isn’t just more training, it’s rethinking how experiences should be built.
Apprenticeships, hands-on learning and AI-powered development tools can help bridge the gap. Work should be designed with career paths in mind, not just immediate outputs.
There’s also the digital employee value proposition (EVP) or the concept that tackles why and how people choose their employers in the AI era. As the technology transforms work, employees want more meaning, clarity, and support. Transparency about AI’s role and designing EVP strategies that help people thrive alongside machines — not compete with them — is essential.
Tech investment is another area where intent and impact don’t align. In the Philippines, only 4 percent of leaders believe their tech investments are delivering human value and it’s high time to redefine success metrics to include well-being, engagement and growth, not just efficiency.
Finally, the third identified dimension is rebuilding organizations for performance. Motivation is personal. Data can help decode what drives each employee — whether it’s recognition, autonomy, or purpose — and tailor experiences for them accordingly.
Performance management also needs a reset. Workers don’t trust traditional systems to measure their true value and there is a necessity to move from rigid reviews to daily coaching, meaningful feedback and enabling conditions for success.
The manager’s role is ripe for reinvention. With AI handling more admin and analysis, managers must focus on developing people, solving problems and guiding transformation. They need to be equipped not just to oversee tasks, but to coach, collaborate and catalyze agility. These are not just soft skills; these are hard currency in today’s world.
Considering these dimensions when forming a framework for one’s organization aids in managing the tensions between short-term results and long-term value. They drive leaders towards a reimagined workplace, one where performance management isn’t just traditional, but geared towards implementing efficiency-boosting practices directly into daily work life.
The path forward lies in rebalancing work, workforce and workplace, not by solving tensions, but by embracing them. When we do, we don’t just optimize performance — we unleash human potential.
In a boundaryless world, that may be the most powerful advantage of all.
Source: Manila Times