top of page

Global heating is supercharging storms, floods and droughts, affecting entire ecosystems and billions of people


The climate crisis is “wreaking havoc” on the planet’s water cycle, with ferocious floods and crippling droughts affecting billions of people, a report has found.



Water is people’s most vital natural resource but global heating is changing the way water moves around the Earth. The analysis of water disasters in 2024, which was the hottest year on record, found they had killed at least 8,700 people, driven 40 million from their homes and caused economic damage of more than $550bn (£445bn).


Rising temperatures, caused by continued burning of fossil fuels, disrupt the water cycle in multiple ways. Warmer air can hold more water vapour, leading to more intense downpours. Warmer seas provide more energy to hurricanes and typhoons,

supercharging their destructive power. Global heating can also increase drought by causing more evaporation from soil, as well as shifting rainfall patterns.


Deadly flash floods hit Nepal and Brazil in 2024, while river flooding caused devastation in central Europe, China and Bangladesh. Super Typhoon Yagi, which struck south-east Asia in September, was intensified by the climate crisis, as was Storm Boris which hit Europe the same month.


Droughts also caused major damage, with crop production in southern Africa halving, causing more than 30 million people to face food shortages. Farmers were also forced to cull livestock as their pastures dried up, and falling output from hydropower dams led to widespread blackouts.


“In 2024, Earth experienced its hottest year on record and water systems across the globe bore the brunt, wreaking havoc on the water cycle,” said the report’s leader, Prof Albert van Dijk.


He said 2024 was a year of extremes but that was not an isolated occurrence. “It is part of a worsening trend of more intense floods, prolonged droughts, and record-breaking extremes.” The report warned of even greater dangers in 2025 as carbon emissions continued to rise .


The 2024 Global Water Monitor Report was produced by an international team of researchers from universities in Australia, Saudi Arabia, China, Germany and elsewhere. The team used data from thousands of ground stations and satellites orbiting the Earth to assess critical water variables such as rainfall, soil moisture, river flows, and flooding.

They found rainfall records are being broken with increasing regularity.


For example, record highs for monthly rainfall were set 27% more often in 2024 than in the year 2000 and daily rainfall records were set 52% more frequently. Record lows were set 38% more often. “So we are seeing worse extremes on both sides,” said Van Dijk.


In southern China from May to July, the Yangtze and Pearl rivers flooded cities and towns, displacing tens of thousands of people and causing hundreds of millions of dollars of damage to crops. The river floods in Bangladesh in August after heavy monsoon rains affected almost 6 million people and destroyed at least a million tonnes of rice.


Meanwhile, in Spain in October more than 500mm of rain fell in eight hours, causing deadly flash floods. The city of Porto Alegre, Brazil, was inundated with two months’ worth of rain in just three days in May, transforming roads into rivers.


“Heavy rainfall events also caused widespread flash flooding in Afghanistan and Pakistan, killing more than 1,000 people,” Van Dijk said. The flooding also displaced 1.5 million people.


In the Amazon, drought struck. “Wildfires driven by the hot and dry weather burned through more than 52,000 sq km in September alone, releasing vast amounts of greenhouse gases,” Van Dijk said. “From historic droughts to catastrophic floods, these extreme events impact lives, livelihoods, and entire ecosystems.”


The researchers said seasonal climate forecasts for 2025 and current conditions suggested droughts could worsen in northern South America, southern Africa, and parts of Asia. Wetter regions such as the Sahel and Europe may face elevated flood risks.


“We need to prepare and adapt to inevitably more severe extreme events,” said Van Dijk. “That can mean stronger flood defences, developing more drought-resilient food production and water supplies, and better early warning systems. Water is our most critical resource, and its extremes – both floods and droughts – are among the greatest threats we face.”


Source: The Guardian

  • Writer: Ziggurat Realestatecorp
    Ziggurat Realestatecorp
  • Jan 7
  • 1 min read

World food commodity prices declined by 2.1 percent in 2024 compared to the previous year, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) said on Friday, but they remain considerably higher than before the Covid-19 pandemic.


FAO's overall Food Price Index averaged 122.0 points 2.6 points or 2.1 percent lower than the average value in 2023.



However, food prices increased over the course of the year, with the index climbing from 117.6 points in January to 127.0 in December.


The index rose 6.7 percent from December 2023 to 2024, with meat, dairy and food oils accounting for the increase.


The United Nations' food agency tracks monthly and global changes in the international prices of a set of globally traded commodities.


Food prices also remain considerably higher roughly 26 percent than they were five years ago.


The disruption to global trade during the Covid-19 pandemic initially saw food prices dip but they later climbed higher amid the surge in inflation as the global economy rebounded.


Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent them spiking to records, since both nations are major wheat exporters, but efforts to ensure shipments were not blocked led to prices easing lower until the beginning of 2024.


The dip in the average value for the index between 2023 and 2024 was mainly due to falls in cereals and sugar prices.


Cereals dropped 13.3 compared to 2023, and the FAO's sugar price index fell 13.2 percent.


The decreases were offset in part by a 9.4-percent rise in the vegetable oil price index.


Source: Manila Times

  • Writer: Ziggurat Realestatecorp
    Ziggurat Realestatecorp
  • Jan 5
  • 2 min read

In a small study of older adults experiencing extreme heat, electric fans didn't reduce core body temperature


Air blowing from an electric fan alone isn’t enough to cool off older adults sweltering indoors in a heat wave, new research shows. A study of 18 adults aged 65 to 72, monitored in a controlled-climate chamber simulating extreme heat wave conditions, found little difference in peak core temperatures as a result of electric fan use, scientists report October 17 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.


Older adults, many of whom prefer to weather heat waves their own homes, are particularly at risk for heat-related health impacts. In the absence of access to air conditioning, using pedestal-style electric fans has been one recommended strategy for individuals at home to try to stay cool. Fans can speed up heat loss, lowering the body’s core temperature, by increasing sweat evaporation.


But recent studies based on biophysical models have suggested that fans may not provide much cooling as the ambient temperature tops 33° Celsius (91° Fahrenheit) — particularly for older adults who may not sweat as efficiently.


So environmental physiologist Fergus O’Connor, now at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia, and colleagues decided to directly test fans’ cooling power during heat wave conditions. Study participants spent three episodes of eight hours each sitting in a chamber at the University of Ottawa, with the temperature set at 36° C (96.8° F) and 45 percent relative humidity. Those conditions are similar to the climate Vancouver citizens endured during the weeklong heat dome that settled over British Columbia in 2021, which led to an estimated 619 deaths in the province.


The climate-controlled chamber also had an electric fan. Previous models simulating fan effectiveness assumed a pretty powerful airflow of around 3.5 to 4.5 meters per second. But that’s more power than many standard home fans are capable of, the researchers note. So each exposure period included a different fan speed: no airflow, a slow airflow of 2 meters per second and a fast airflow of 4 meters per second.


The team then evaluated the subjects’ body core temperature, cardiovascular strain, dehydration level and thermal comfort — the perception of feeling too hot or cold. The findings suggested that, compared to the control case of no fan airflow at all, the slower airflow resulted in no significant changes in core temperature, blood pressure, fluid consumption or thermal comfort. The faster airflow improved perceptions of thermal comfort — but, biophysically speaking, there was no significant improvement. 


Source: Science News

© Copyright 2018 by Ziggurat Real Estate Corp. All Rights Reserved.

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Instagram
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • flipboard_mrsw
  • RSS
bottom of page