Moving Forward: How the Philippines Can Unlock Health, Mobility & Climate Wins by Walking and Cycling

In many Philippine cities and towns, we see clogged roads, increasing vehicle ownership, traffic congestion, air pollution, and rising chronic health problems such as obesity and cardiovascular disease. At the same time, the country is highly vulnerable to climate change: sea‑level rise, typhoons, and the need to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are real concerns. So there is a strong case for tackling mobility, health, and climate together. A recent global study (published in PNAS) shows that investing in walking and cycling infrastructure is one of those rare “triple‑win” strategies.

source: Scientific American Dec 2025

What the study found and why it matters for the Philippines

The global research shows that when cities are designed so that people can walk or cycle safely and conveniently, the benefits are huge.

Key findings:

• Higher population density → shorter trips → more walking/cycling.

• More extensive and better bicycle lane networks → meaningful uptick in cycling rates.

• Even climates with hot summers or cold winters are no barrier — what matters is the infrastructure and design.

• If all cities matched Copenhagen’s cycling network extent, global emissions from private vehicles could drop ~6%, and the health benefits would be in the hundreds of billions of dollars annually.

For the Philippines:

• Many urban areas (e.g., metro Manila, Cebu, Davao, etc.) already have high densities and many short trips. This is an advantage.

• If we bolster walking/cycling infrastructure (bike lanes, pedestrian‑friendly streets, mixed‐use neighborhoods) we can tap into latent potential for active mobility.

• Reducing vehicle dependency helps reduce congestion, air pollution (which affects health), and transport emissions (which matter for climate commitments).

• Health gains from active travel (more walking/cycling) include reduced risk of chronic disease, improved wellbeing and reduced health system burdens.

Specific Opportunities & Considerations for the Philippines

1. Urban planning & mixed‐use development In many Philippine cities, residential areas and workplaces/shopping/amenities may be separated, so short trips get done by vehicle or motorcycle. Encouraging mixed‐use development (homes, shops, offices closer together) helps make walking/cycling feasible.

2. Safe, continuous infrastructure for active travel Simply having a painted bike lane is not enough. The global study emphasized street‐design: separation from vehicle traffic, safe crossings, comfort for walkers/cyclists. In the Philippines, many sidewalks are discontinuous, obstructed, or absent; many bike lanes are fragmented or share space with vehicles. Upgrading these can raise walking/cycling rates.

3. Contextual fit & local culture The study shows: you don’t have to replicate Copenhagen exactly to succeed. What matters is tailoring to local conditions — topography, climate, culture, travel habits. For the Philippines, for example, around‑the‑year warm/humid climate is the norm, so shade, green corridors, rain protection might matter more. Hilly terrain or informal settlement patterns may present challenges.

4. Equity and inclusion Many Filipinos rely on walking and cycling out of necessity (not choice). Infrastructure upgrades must consider low‑income neighborhoods, safe access for women, children, elderly. Also linking active travel with public transit is key (so you can walk/cycle to the bus/train station).

5. Health and climate co‑benefits

   • Health: more walking/cycling → more physical activity → fewer chronic diseases, lower health system costs, improved quality of life.

   • Climate & emissions: lower reliance on private motor vehicles → fewer GHG emissions. This helps the Philippines meet its climate goals and reduces vulnerability from transport‑related air pollution.

   • Resilience & efficiency: A diversified mobility system that includes walking/cycling is more resilient (less dependent on fuel, less vulnerable to traffic jams) and more space‐efficient (less land used for parking, roads).

A Few Action Steps for Local Government & Communities

• Conduct a mobility audit: identify neighborhoods with high short‑trip potential (schools, workplaces, shops within 1‑3 km) and lacking safe walking/cycling infrastructure.

• Prioritize pedestrian first: wide continuous sidewalks, safe crossings, shade trees, lighting.

• Expand and connect bike lane networks: ensure continuity, safe intersections, visibility, and links to transit hubs and workplaces.

• Promote mixed‐use zoning and local amenities so shorter trips become practical.

• Launch behavioral campaigns: encourage walking/cycling by showing benefits, safety tips, community‑rides, walking groups.

• Measure and monitor progress: track mode‑share of walking/cycling, infrastructure length, safety outcomes, health metrics.

• Secure funding: active‑travel infrastructure tends to deliver strong cost‑benefit (health + environment) so build the business case for local budgeting or donor funding.

Why This Matters Now

The Philippines is at a critical juncture: urbanization is increasing, vehicle fleets are growing, climate change risks are mounting, and public health burdens are rising. Investing in walking and cycling isn’t just an “add‐on” — it’s a strategic investment in sustainable mobility, healthier citizens, and lower emissions. The global study gives strong evidence: the infrastructure choices we make today will shape health and climate outcomes for decades.

Conclusion

If the Philippines can shift more mobility toward walking and cycling — by density‐friendly development, robust infrastructure, and inclusive design — we stand to gain on multiple fronts: better health, less traffic stress, cleaner air, fewer emissions, more livable cities. The roadmap is there; what we need now is the will, the planning, and the action.

millard-ball-et-al-2025-global-health-and-climate-benefits-from-walking-and-cycling-infras.

Download • 2.81MB

Source: Ziggurat Real Estate

Extreme heat impact as PH reaches boiling point

Ten years ago, the world ga­thered in Paris, pens poised above a landmark agreement. The Paris Agreement, born of collective resolve, aimed to rewrite the climate narrative, setting ambitious goals to curb emissions and hold global warming at bay. As we mark this milestone a decade later, the question hangs heavy in the air: “Have we steered the ship away from the climate precipice, or are we merely rearranging deck chairs on a rapidly heating planet?”

A new report, a chilling testament to the escalating crisis of extreme heat, offers a stark reality check. “Ten Years of the Paris Agreement: The Present and Future of Extreme Heat,” a collaboration between Climate Central and World Weather Attribution, is a global analysis spanning the decade since the Paris accord. It reveals the extent to which our world has already been reshaped by rising temperatures and casts an ominous shadow on what lies ahead.

While the Paris Agreement has tempered some of the most catastrophic warming scenarios projected before 2015, the report underscores that the battle against extreme heat is far from won. As Friederike Otto, climate science professor at the Center for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, noted: “The Paris Agreement is a powerful, legally binding framework that can help us avoid the most severe impacts of climate change.”

The analysis paints a picture of a world grappling with extreme heat’s relentless advance. Since 2015, surging global temperatures have resulted in an average of 11 additional hot days each year. Beyond slightly warmer summers, this is a fundamental shift in weather patterns that pushes the boundaries of human and ecological tolerance. The report projects that even if current emission reduction pledges are fully honored (a monumental “if” in itself), the trajectory is still toward 2.6 degrees Celsius of warming by 2100. This seemingly modest increase unleashes a cascade of dire consequences: events that are already highly impactful on people and ecosystems would be intolerably more severe.

 n Number of hot days per year in each country for global warming levels of 2.6 C and 4.0 C above preindustrial temperatures.PHOTO FROM THE REPORT ‘TEN YEARS OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT: THE PRESENT AND FUTURE OF EXTREME HEAT’

Today, extreme heat contributes to an estimated 500,000 deaths worldwide annually. The most vulnerable among us — the elderly, outdoor workers, those with preexisting health conditions and marginalized communities — bear its deadly brunt.

The implications of these global trends reverberate with urgency in the Philippines, an archipelago nation straddling the equator. Uniquely vulnerable to the intensifying impacts of extreme heat, the country can expect a relentless increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme heat events, with profound consequences across sectors.

Consequences for the nation

The health of Filipinos is on the line. As temperatures soar, heat-related illnesses and fatalities can surge, particularly in densely populated urban areas and among vulnerable populations lacking access to adequate cooling and health care. The agricultural sector, the lifeblood of many Filipino communities, faces a formidable threat.

Rising temperatures and prolonged droughts can decimate crops, imperiling food security and threatening the livelihoods of countless farmers. The Philippines’ critical infrastructure is also under siege. Extreme heat can strain the power grid, leading to blackouts and disruptions. It can buckle roads and transportation networks, disrupting commerce and everyday life.

As Kristina Dahl, vice president for Science at Climate Central, warns, “The Paris Agreement is helping many regions of the world avoid some of the worst possible outcomes of climate change, but make no mistake — we are still heading for a dangerously hot future.”

The government’s National Adaptation Plan (2023-2050) aims to fortify the nation against such climate impacts. But the stark reality is that a comprehensive Heat Action Plan is still under development.

The most urgent priority is for countries to dramatically increase their emission reduction targets, aligning their efforts with the Paris Agreement’s ambitious goals of limiting warming to 1.5 C or well below 2 C. Bold adaptation measures must be taken, and investments made to reduce the impacts of extreme heat to communities. This includes heat early warning systems that are effective at alerting the public about impending heat waves, and comprehensive heat action plans at the national and local levels.

Urban planning must promote cool roofs and incorporate accessible public transport systems that integrate cooling and shading. Educational campaigns can elevate public awareness, empowering citizens to protect themselves and their communities from extreme heat. Protection should be prioritized for the aforementioned most vulnerable. Intentional and equitable adap­tation efforts should include disaggregated data on gender, age and disability.

The future of extreme heat globally and in the Philippines hinges on the choices we make today. The world is at a crossroads: to choose between complacency and action, between a future defined by runaway warming, and a future where we protect the health and safety of all.

Source: Manila Times

Why family bullying over inheritance has become rife

UK Cost of living is making relatives impatient for their money.

Trillions of pounds are expected to be passed down through families over the next 30 years in a “great wealth transfer”.

However, as households are squeezed by rising prices, increasing numbers of older people are being pestered to hand over money by impatient “entitled” relatives. But this pressure to give up their assets can amount to financial abuse, campaigners warn. “This is not just a growing trend but an epidemic,” said Richard Robinson of Hourglass, a charity that campaigns against the abuse of older people.

This type of financial abuse is distinct from fraud or scams because it is not perpetrated by strangers, but a trusted person in the victim’s life. More than half of perpetrators are an adult child of the victim, according to research by Hourglass, and 81 per cent are a family member.

Older people are being manipulated to hand over cash to family members struggling with the cost of living.

“This is a massively underplayed issue in all walks of society, something we’ve been calling for urgent governmental action on for many years,” Robinson said. The charity supports 75,000 victims a year, up from about 4,000 in 2018.

Vicky Reynal, a money psychotherapist, said a common reason for “inheritance impatience” is a sense of entitlement to the victim’s estate. “The economic climate we live in is creating a lot of tension,” she said. “Handouts from parents are seen as increasingly necessary, and inheritance seems too far down the line to make much of a difference.”

Housing and tax pressures

Many families are seeking early access to inheritances to get on the property ladder. The average house price in the UK has more than tripled from £84,000 in 2000 to £293,000 today, according to the Office for National Statistics.

As a result, 57 per cent of renters believe that buying a home is impossible without family help, Barclays found. Rising tax pressures also drive demands for family handouts. The inheritance tax-free threshold will be frozen at £325,000 until at least 2030, and pension savings will be included in estates from April 2027.

This will mean many more estates facing a 40 per cent tax bill. And the seven-year rule, which exempts from inheritance tax gifts of money, provided the donor lives for seven years after making the gift, adds a sense of urgency. Now family members are pushing to receive sums sooner.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that almost all of the £17 billion gifted or lent by pensioners each year is given to their adult children. While most of this money is given freely and lovingly, some pensioners may be coerced into giving it away earlier than planned, often through emotional manipulation.

“We’re definitely seeing people with more of a sense of entitlement or ownership of their future inheritance, as opposed to anything they might receive as a boon or a gift,” said Stuart Downey from TWM Solicitors, based in the southeast. Reynal described how she has seen clients struggle to refuse their children’s demands for money.

Some children even use threats such as cutting them off from their grandchildren or no longer visiting if the money is withheld. Many victims fear they will be sent into a care home against their will. Downey said he has seen many clients’ families place their elderly relative in a far cheaper care home than they could afford, to save their inheritance.

This is known as “inheritance preservation”, where family members block pensioners from spending their money in the hope of taking it themselves.

Taking advantage

Callers to the Hourglass helpline have suffered financial losses of more than £53 million in the past three years. But in reality this figure is probably much higher, because only 14 per cent of callers disclosed the amount they had given away.

Robinson said that many older people were reluctant to report how much they had lost. They didn’t consider transferring money to family members as abuse and didn’t recognize that they may have been manipulated.

The attitudes of both victim and perpetrator are a big obstacle to the prevention of this type of abuse. In England 25 per cent of people do not believe that taking items from an older relative’s home without asking is a form of abuse, according to a survey of more than 2,000 people conducted by YouGov for Hourglass.

And 26 per cent of respondents did not believe that using power of attorney over an older relative for personal financial gain was abuse, nor that family members trying to change the wills of older relatives was a form of abuse.

At the same time, many victims do not want to see, or perhaps admit, that a family member may be taking advantage of them. “Most people don’t believe they’re being abused,” Robinson said. “They trust and love those people, who are their family and are there to look after them. They believe that if they call them out as abusers, they’ll lose that support.”

How can people protect themselves?

Reynal said families must learn to speak openly about finances and inheritance, and added that for those passing down an estate, “it’s important to be clear about why you’re doing what you’re doing”.

Family members should also try to empathise with their older relatives. “Step into the shoes of the parents to empathise with the impact of those demands being made,” she said. Older people can create a lasting power of attorney while they have mental capacity.

This gives someone the authority to manage their finances if they become unable to do so. It is recommended to seek professional guidance before making any decisions.

While there are some tools that can be used to help protect finances, such as bank account controls, Robinson said: “People are craving inheritance like there’s no tomorrow, and the safeguards are simply not there.” 

Source: The Times