top of page
  • Writer: Ziggurat Realestatecorp
    Ziggurat Realestatecorp
  • Jul 27
  • 6 min read

Companies like Compass, Rocket, and Zillow are trying to create one-stop shopping venues.

 

The housing market is barreling toward its third bad year of home sales. Once demand roars back, real estate transactions could look different for buyers, sellers, and investors. Anemic home sales are accelerating a housing market reconfiguration long in the making. In the coming years, it may be more common to purchase a home from one of the big public builders than a local developer, or secure a mortgage from the same portal you used when shopping for a home.


Big real estate companies are building digital platforms to keep more parts of the home purchase transaction under one roof—and taking business from real estate brokerages and mortgage lenders. “Anything that makes things easier for people—that’s where the world is moving,” says Tim Bodner, PwC’s real estate deals leader.


The fight for dominance recently spilled into the courts. Compass, the largest U.S. brokerage by sales volume, sued listings portal Zillow Group over new rules regarding listings that are initially viewable only by its agents and their clients. The lawsuit isn’t just a fight over wonky listing rules, but a conflict about the shape of the future housing market.


Consumers have been backing away from buying a home for several years. The number of existing homes sold fell to nearly 30-year lows in both 2023 and 2024. In the first five months of 2025, homes sold at an average seasonally adjusted annual rate of about 4.1 million, down from more than six million as recently as 2021, according to National Association of Realtors data.


The whole sector is under pressure until sales climb to at least five million, says Leo Pareja, CEO of brokerage eXp Realty. That’s far away: The Mortgage Bankers Association expects existing home sales to ramp up in the coming years but to remain below five million through 2027, as prices hold firm and mortgage rates remain above 6%. The path ahead for consumers will look increasingly streamlined—and is rife with both opportunities and risks.


Shifting Winds


 It isn’t just buyers and sellers backing out of the market. The National Association of Realtors, the industry’s largest trade group, is budgeting for its membership to decline to 1.2 million in 2026, from nearly 1.6 million as recently as 2022. That’s in part “due to the housing market’s current headwinds,” a NAR spokesperson says.


“There’s going to be sort of a reckoning” if sales remain slow, says Columbia Business School professor of real estate Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh. “Probably a bunch of people are going to quit this profession altogether.” Where some smaller brokerages see trouble, others see buying opportunities. Compass, a $3.2 billion real estate brokerage based in New York, grew its ranks of principal agents nearly 42% in this year’s first quarter from the year prior, largely because of its acquisitions. “Most brokerages are really struggling financially,” says Rory Golod, Compass’ president of growth and communications. “They don’t have the size, the scale, and sort of the balance sheet to get through this.”


ree

Consolidation is coming to homebuilding, too. At a time when more builders are offering buyer incentives or slashing prices, the big players’ economies of scale allow them to keep costs lower. “In a slower and choppier market, mergers and acquisitions get more common,” says Ali Wolf, chief economist of real estate research firm Zonda. Publicly traded home builders comprised 52% of all new home sales in 2024, a larger share than anytime since at least 2005, Zonda data show. That could rise as high as 65% in the future, says Wolf.


Perhaps most emblematic of where housing is headed is the coming unification of Rocket, the nonbank lender best known for mortgage origination, with mortgage servicer Mr. Cooper and brokerage and home-listing portal Redfin. The three companies “realize that we are stronger together than we would be apart,” says Varun Krishna, Rocket’s CEO. The combined company will be the largest mortgage servicer and second largest lender in the U.S., according to Inside Mortgage Finance data. Redfin, meanwhile, gives them “the brand name and real estate brokerage that they never had before,” says Wedbush Securities analyst Jay McCanless.


Across categories, consumers now expect a more personalized experience, says David Steinbach, global chief investment officer of Hines, a real estate investment manager with $90 billion in assets. “That consumer taste for a better service, better outcome— which only data can do—means the scaled groups are going to win. The big are going to need to get bigger in order to better serve the needs.”


The Future


Companies that derive earnings from the homebuying process—such as listing portals, mortgage companies, and brokerages—have long looked for ways to capture a bigger slice of the pie in a fractured housing market. They may have finally settled on a recipe.

Zillow emerged from the 2021 failure of its volatile business buying and selling homes with a new plan: build a “housing super app” offering a range of housing services to buyers, sellers, renters, and agents in one place.


It hasn’t been a smooth ride. Zillow stock is down 5% this year, and 65%  below its pandemic high-water mark. But its push to integrate mortgages— whether through a mortgage marketplace or a lending arm of its own—into the buyer experience, along with investments in rentals and tools for agents, is finally paying off.


Zillow expects to be profitable under generally accepted accounting principles in 2025 for the first time since 2012. “The silver lining of a bad macro is it forces you to really be crisp about what’s working and what’s not working,” says Zillow CEO Jeremy Wacksman.

In the company’s super-app future, the homebuying transaction will never leave the company’s orbit. The whole process—shopping, hiring and communicating with an agent, talking to a loan officer, making an offer, getting a mortgage, and closing—will happen “in the palm of your hand inside an app like Zillow,”Wacksman says.


Across the spectrum, big players in real estate are envisioning what a less fractured housing transaction looks like. Buyers shopping with a Compass agent now have access to a dashboard to keep track of their communication, forms, to-dos, and referrals.

Realtor.com—a home-listings portal run by Move, which, like Barron’s, is owned by News Corp—sees an opportunity “to create an open marketplace, not just for real estate services, but for mortgage services and more,” says Move CEO Damian Eales. “This part of our business will evolve quite significantly in coming years.”


The Consumer


Mega-companies come with both opportunities and risks for consumers. Rocket, Zillow, and others see the opportunity to cut down on friction for buyers and sellers by uniting disparate parts of the housing ecosystem. “The more integrated the experience is, the easier it is to actually lower costs, and then pass on savings to the person who matters most, which is the consumer,” says Rocket’s Krishna.


That isn’t the way some left-leaning politicians see it. In a letter to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, five senators including Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) said that Rocket’s Redfin and Mr. Cooper deals “may reduce choice and raise prices for American families in the housing market” at a time when costs are already high.


“I couldn’t disagree more,” says Rocket’s Krishna.


No matter how a buyer purchases a home, it pays to consider the competition. Freddie Mac in 2023 said that borrowers who compared quotes from at least four mortgage companies stood to save as much as $1,200 a year compared with those who only sought one offer. “Sometimes the way these platforms work is they basically exploit impatient consumers,” says Columbia’s Van Nieuwerburgh. “It’s nice and it’s convenient, and they basically end up overpaying for that convenience.”


But bigger companies could also cut costs, particularly when it comes to home-building, says Van Nieuwerburgh. “There’s a huge number of very small construction firms that are frankly very inefficient,” he says. Deregulation efforts “could potentially lead to some much-needed consolidation,” resulting in more homes getting built—and more options for buyers.


As companies converge on similar visions of the user experience, they diverge on how it will be structured. Take private listings, for example: Advocates like Compass say sellers should be able to test the market before listing to the whole world, while critics like Zillow and eXp say such networks disadvantage buyers. The debate has split the industry down the middle, and is already changing the homebuying process. While Compass encourages sellers to list privately first, Zillow and Redfin have banned listings that aren’t immediately syndicated.


The industry’s evolution won’t stop with consolidation. “You finally have industry participants…all rethinking how things should work and criticizing existing processes that have been an afterthought for the past century,” says KBW analyst Ryan Tomasello.


Source: Barron's

 
 
 

Home ownership in the Philippines remains out of reach for many households due to the wide gap between residential property prices and income, particularly in urban areas like Metro Manila and Davao, according to the Urban Land Institute (ULI).


In the 2025 ULI Asia-Pacific Home Attainability Index, the Philippine capital was identified as one of the most expensive livable cities in the Asia-Pacific region.


Condominium prices in Metro Manila are now 19.8 times the median annual household income, far exceeding affordable levels, the Washington, DC nonprofit research and education group said. Townhouses are even more unattainable at 33.4 times the average income.


“Home attainability is still a problem in Metro Manila, to the extent that many families, even those working in one of the capital’s business districts, choose to buy a landed home on the outskirts of the city and commute,” ULI said in the report.


To be considered attainable, median home prices should not exceed five times a household’s annual income, while median monthly rents should take up no more than 30% of their monthly income. Metro Manila and Davao, however, both far exceed these thresholds.


ULI said the average rent for a Metro Manila apartment consumes about 141% of a household’s monthly income. In Davao, rents take up 94% of earnings, still significantly above the affordability benchmark.


While Davao fares better than Metro Manila, home prices are still about 14 times the median income, which ULI described as “scarcely more attainable.”


Data from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas showed that in the first quarter, condominium prices rose 10.6% year on year, while house prices climbed 4.5%.


Amid rising property prices, ULI noted that the development of major railway infrastructure projects has made living outside the capital more attractive to working families, even as commuting remains a challenge.


Ironically, despite high prices, Metro Manila is also grappling with a supply glut of condominiums due to a wave of new projects launched from 2019 to 2023.


Many of these unsold units are in areas outside business districts that were affected by the government’s crackdown on Philippine offshore gaming operators.


“The oversupply is mainly noticeable in the lower-mid segment, where units typically cost between P3 million and P7 million,” ULI said, citing data from real estate consultancy KMC Savills, Inc.


For a studio or one-bedroom condo in this price range, monthly mortgage payments may run from P20,000 to P40,000 ($354 to $708) — a significant burden for Filipino families earning P50,000 to P60,000 monthly.


At the same price, a three- to four-bedroom house outside Metro Manila could be bought, according to the report. “The problem is that many of these condominiums were targeted at middle-class families who prefer a more distant home to a city condo,” it pointed out.


While developers have introduced more flexible payment terms to drive sales, high land acquisition and construction costs have limited their ability to offer significant price cuts.

“Some observers believe this will lead more to explore alternatives such as co-living or multifamily rental use for unsold projects,” ULI said.


To improve affordability, the group urged property developers to cut construction costs and use less expensive land.


“Developers could look at using modular construction to reduce development costs and focus on simple, repeatable designs to ensure faster delivery and therefore lower costs,” Mark Cooper, senior director for thought leadership at ULI Asia-Pacific, said in an e-mailed reply to questions.


“They should consider partnering with local governments to access land more cheaply in return for developing public or affordable housing,” he added.


Across the Asia-Pacific region, ULI said home attainability remains a widespread issue. Only seven of 51 market segments studied offered homes priced within five times the median income. In contrast, rental homes were generally more affordable, with 41 of 51 markets offering rents below 30% of monthly income.


ULI noted that key factors influencing home demand include population growth, aging demographics, household formation, urbanization, immigration, income growth, financing availability and transaction costs.


 
 
 
  • Writer: Ziggurat Realestatecorp
    Ziggurat Realestatecorp
  • Jul 12
  • 4 min read

ULI Asia Pacific has released its 2025 Asia Pacific Home Attainability Index, revealing persistent challenges to affordable or accessible housing across the region. The fourth edition of the report assesses 51 market segments across 41 major cities.


Home attainability in the context of this report means median home prices which are no more than five times median annual household income and median monthly rents which are no more than 30 percent on median monthly income.


“Four years of ULI analysis paint a consistent and concerning picture: attaining affordable and adequate housing remains out of reach for far too many across our dynamic region,” said Alan Beebe, CEO, ULI Asia Pacific. “While rental markets offer a crucial lifeline, the fundamental challenge of purchasing a home persists, particularly in major economic hubs. This year’s Index reinforces that solving this requires government policy, innovative financing, embracing new construction technologies, and practical public-private partnerships focused on delivering diverse housing options at scale.”


“Home attainability remains constrained across the region, despite income growth and price dips in some markets,” said Mark Cooper, Senior Director, Thought Leadership, ULI Asia Pacific and lead author of the report. “This year’s report underscores a deepening divide, with rental housing offering significantly more relief than home purchase, and major cities becoming increasingly exclusive. Hong Kong apartments are still the second most unattainable in the region.”


ree

10 Trends: Asia Pacific’s Housing


1. Home attainability remains constrained across the region: Only seven market segments out of 51 offered home attainability to buyers—homes priced at five times median income or less—in 2024. This is the same number as in 2023. Furthermore, no city in the report scores below four for purchase attainability. Across such a large and diverse region, a crude average of segment attainability scores for 2024 and 2023 is more or less identical (2024: 11.68, 2023:12).


2. Major cities are the most expensive: Only three market segments in major cities across the region offer homes at or less than five times median income: Singapore HDB apartments and apartments in Melbourne and Kuala Lumpur. Singapore is the only capital city to offer attainable homes for purchase.


3. Rental housing is more attainable region-wide: rental homes are considerably more attainable than for-sale properties; 41 out of 51 market segments offer rental homes at below 30% of monthly income. The more expensive segments for rental tend to be in first tier cities in both developed and developing nations, although there are exceptions, such as apartments in Tokyo’s 23 Wards, also known as Tokyo Ku, where rents are only 17% of median income.


The drivers of housing attainability remain the same. Factors affecting demand include population growth, population age profile, household formation, urbanisation, immigration, income growth, the cost and availability of financing, and transaction costs. Factors affecting supply include government provision of housing for sale or rent, the availability and cost of land, the construction materials and labour costs, and the cost and availability of financing, planning regulations, and infrastructure development.


4. Hong Kong scores worst for home attainability: Falling property prices in Hong Kong have made apartments marginally more affordable, they were 23.4 times median annual household income in 2024, compared with 26.5 times in 2022. However, Hong Kong apartments are still the second most unattainable in the region. Meanwhile, average rents are 72% of median monthly income, up from 70% in 2022 and 69% in 2023, as rents have continued to rise.


5. China price drops have boosted attainability, but provided little comfort for buyers: China has seen prices fall in major cities in recent years, but they remain above 10 times household income in all cities covered in this report and above 20 times in Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen. Furthermore, the prospect of prices falling further has kept buyers out of the market.


6. Interest rate cuts have boosted attainability in some markets: Lower interest rates in markets including Australia, Korea and China have made buying a home more attainable. However, the interest rate outlook for the region and the world has become more uncertain in 2025, so the cost of borrowing may remain elevated in many markets. Furthermore, lower interest rates are a double-edged sword, as they also drive higher prices.


7. Government policy leads the way: While the private sector is responsible for delivering the bulk of housing in most markets, the single biggest driver of market conditions is government legislation and regulation. This means boosting housing attainability requires public-private partnerships.


8. The Affordability-Accessibility Divide: In developed markets, homes are unattainable because they are too expensive, however in larger developing markets such as India and Indonesia, there remains a shortage of basic housing for millions of people. The Indonesian government estimates that one-third of households do not have access to adequate housing. There, a public housebuilding programme has not been able to keep pace with population growth.


9. Multifamily Housing’s Untapped Potential: The multifamily residential sector is relatively undeveloped in the Asia Pacific region (except Japan), though growing in China and Australia. This report shows that rental housing is more attainable, thus boosting supply will improve attainability. Furthermore, renting remains very affordable in many markets, with rents less than 25% of monthly income. This suggests potential for the real estate industry to deliver more rental properties and the potential for boosted returns.


There is also increasing demand for related rental residential sectors, such as senior living, co-living, and student accommodation. These could provide additional opportunities for real estate investors and developers, which may contribute to overall housing attainability.


10. Tech’s Promise: Adoption of modular construction, 3D printing, and other proptech lags in housing development but holds significant potential to reduce costs and construction times in the future.


Generational Impact


There are also particular demographics in Tier I cities with greater challenges, particularly younger people and young families. In a city such as Hong Kong, where both rents and prices are high, it is difficult for younger people to save enough to buy a home. Meanwhile, in many cities, elderly people find housing just as unattainable as their younger fellow citizens. There is clearly potential for further investigation of the housing challenges which face different generations.



Source: Urban Land

 
 
 

© Copyright 2018 by Ziggurat Real Estate Corp. All Rights Reserved.

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Instagram
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • flipboard_mrsw
  • RSS
bottom of page