top of page
  • Writer: Ziggurat Realestatecorp
    Ziggurat Realestatecorp
  • Jul 9, 2025
  • 2 min read

The Philippine labor market improved in May, latest Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) data showed, with the labor force participation rate rising to its highest in 20 years and both unemployment and underemployment going down.


The jobless rate eased to 3.9 percent from 4.1 percent in April and a year ago, with the count of those without work falling to 2.03 million from 2.06 million and 2.11 million a month and a year earlier.



Underemployment, which counts those wanting additional hours of work, additional job, or a new job with longer hours, slipped to 13.1 percent from 14.6 percent in April.

It was, however, well above the 9.9 percent recorded in May last year.


In terms of magnitude, 6.60 million of the 50.29 million individuals with jobs were classified as underemployed. Of this, 59.2 percent worked fewer than 40 hours a week, the PSA said, while the remaining 40.8 percent were employed for 40 hours or more.


The number of employed persons rose from 48.67 million in April and 48.87 million in May 2024. This brought the employment rate to 96.1 percent, slightly higher than the 95.9 percent recorded in both April this year and May 2024.


The services sector remained the dominant source of employment, accounting for 61.8 percent of all jobs in May. This was followed by agriculture at 21.1 percent and industry at 17.1 percent.



Wholesale and retail trade and the repair of motor vehicles accounted for the largest share of jobs at 19.8 percent, followed by agriculture and forestry at 18.8 percent and construction at 9.5 percent.


The biggest year-on-year gains in employment were seen in wholesale and retail trade, which added 489,000 jobs. This was followed by agriculture and forestry with 469,000, administrative and support service activities with 371,000, accommodation and food services with 365,000, and other service activities with 175,000.


The manufacturing sector suffered the most job losses, shedding 374,000 positions from the previous year. Construction followed with a loss of 298,000 jobs while mining and quarrying, public administration and defense and water supply and waste management also recorded annual declines.


The labor force participation rate (LFPR), meanwhile, climbed to 65.8 percent in May, up from 64.8 percent in the same month last year and 63.7 percent in April 2025. This translates to 52.32 million Filipinos aged 15 years and older who were either employed or actively seeking work — the largest labor force recorded since April 2005.


Socioeconomic Planning Secretary Arsenio Balisacan said this was the highest LFPR since 2005.


“We welcome this development in labor force participation because it indicates a healthy and competitive Philippine labor market,” Balisacan said in a statement.

“Generally, a larger workforce can lead to increased economic output and potentially higher GDP (gross domestic product) growth, as more people contribute to the economy.”


Balisacan said the government’s ongoing push for key infrastructure flagship projects would help close development gaps and attract more investments that can generate jobs.


He also stressed the need to improve how public funds were being used by focusing limited resources on priority areas such as quality education, healthcare, food security and connectivity infrastructure.


Source: Manila Times

 
 
 
  • Writer: Ziggurat Realestatecorp
    Ziggurat Realestatecorp
  • Jun 20, 2025
  • 3 min read

The Philippines improved one spot in a global competitiveness index, but remained a laggard in the Asia-Pacific region, according to the Asian Institute of Management Rizalino S. Navarro Policy Center for Competitiveness (AIM RSN PCC).


Citing Switzerland-based International Institute for Management Development’s (IMD) 2025 World Competitiveness Yearbook (WCY), the center said that the Philippines ranked 51st out of 69 economies.


AIM RSN PCC is the IMD’s partner in the Philippines.


Despite the improvement in ranking, the Philippines still lagged its neighbors, ranking 13th out of 14 Asia-Pacific economies in the index.


Singapore ranked second in the global index, while Hong Kong ranked third and Taiwan placed sixth.


The Philippines was also behind Malaysia (23rd), Thailand (30th) and Indonesia (40th).

The WCY, which started in 1989, ranks economies across four competitiveness factors: economic performance, government efficiency, business efficiency, and infrastructure.

For this year, the report covered 69 economies, up from 67 last year, following the addition of Kenya, Namibia, and Oman.


Switzerland placed first in the overall ranking.


In a statement, AIM RSN PCC said that the Philippines’ results this year are “a mixed bag,” as improvements were seen in two out of the four pillars.


In particular, the country’s rank in the economic performance pillar improved to 33rd in this year’s report, up seven spots from 40th place last year, after only seeing a marginal drop in the international investment sub-factor.


“The rest of the sub-factors saw improvements to their rankings, with the prices sub-factor improving the most by climbing nine places from 48th in 2024 to 39th in 2025,” AIM RSN PCC said.


“The domestic economy indicator improved from 27th in 2024 to 22nd in 2025, the international trade indicator improved from 58th in 2024 to 55th in 2025, and the employment indicator rose from 10th in 2024 to 7th in 2025,” it added.


On the other hand, the Philippines moved up one spot to 60th in the infrastructure pillar, which has been a “perennial challenge” for the country in previous years.


“The basic infrastructure sub-factor (60th spot from 62nd) and technological infrastructure sub-factor (43rd spot from 55th) saw improvements to their respective rankings,” AIM RSN PCC said.


However, the center said that declines were seen in the scientific infrastructure sub-factor (62nd spot from 60th) and the health and environment sub-factor (61st spot from 60th).


Meanwhile, the country slipped three notches in the business efficiency pillar to 46th in 2025 and dipped two spots in the government efficiency pillar to 51st.


The AIM center said that the results of the report reflect the challenges the Philippines continues to face, such as “rekindling the country’s economic dynamism and growth trajectory, addressing inflation expectations, promoting investments in inclusive technology, improving education and healthcare, and adapting to shifting global economic and geopolitical dynamics.”


Sought for comment, Reyes Tacandong & Co. Senior Adviser Jonathan L. Ravelas said that the slight rise in the country’s competitiveness ranking is a “positive signal.”

However, he noted that the Philippines falling behind regional peers shows a need for deeper reforms.


“Prioritizing digital infrastructure, streamlining bureaucracy, and investing in talent development can help us close the gap and compete more effectively,” Mr. Ravelas said in a Viber message.


Meanwhile, Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. Chief Economist Michael L. Ricafort said that the net improvement in the ranking “may be partly attributed to the easing inflation trend that justified local policy rate cuts.”


He also sees the country’s economic growth, which is among the fastest in Asia, may drive competitiveness.


To further improve the ranking, Mr. Ricafort said the country needs to “further develop infrastructure, boost productivity in agriculture and manufacturing industries, bring down electricity costs, and further ease and reduce the cost of doing business.”



 
 
 
  • Writer: Ziggurat Realestatecorp
    Ziggurat Realestatecorp
  • Jun 8, 2025
  • 1 min read

The Philippines tumbled 35 places to 116th out of 122 countries in the 2025 edition of the International Trade Barrier Index (TBI), published biennially by nonprofit Tholos Foundation.


The country’s TBI score worsened to 5.25 in 2025 from 5.15 in 2023 on a 10-point scale where lower is better, lagging behind the global average of 4.22 and the East Asia & Pacific average of 4.20.


The index evaluates trade openness based on tariffs, nontariff barriers, services restrictions, and facilitation.


Trade Barrier Index
Trade Barrier Index



 
 
 

© Copyright 2018 by Ziggurat Real Estate Corp. All Rights Reserved.

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Instagram
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • flipboard_mrsw
  • RSS
bottom of page