Filipino families and VAT

For nearly two decades, Filipinos have lived under the weight of the 12-percent value-added tax (VAT), once 10 percent, under Republic Act 9337, or the Expanded Value Added Tax Law. The increase was justified as a fiscal necessity as the government needed to stabilize revenues, reduce deficits and strengthen its financial performance.

In many aspects, the policy worked. VAT has become one of the government’s most reliable revenue streams, funding education, health care and infrastructure projects essential for national development. However, what was once fiscally sound for the government has not been socially sustainable for Filipino households.

The 2-percent hike may look small on paper but in reality it has drained billions from consumers over the years. VAT touches nearly every aspect of daily life, taxing Filipinos at every turn — from food, utilities, tuition fees, health care and even internet subscriptions.

Unlike direct taxes, it is unavoidable and embedded in every transaction. It is a burden that is shifted from the seller to the final consumer. For families already struggling with inflation, stagnant wages and rising costs of living, that extra 2 percent is not just a number, it’s a decision-maker. It can mean the difference between a meal on the table and an empty stomach, keeping the lights on or sitting in the dark, or paying for medicine or skipping treatment.

It is a silent deduction from every peso earned, making it a burden, and consumers have no choice but to endure higher costs on goods and services. In a country where private consumption accounts for more than 70 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP), the strain on households reverberates across the economy. When families spend less, businesses earn less and growth slows.

The debate over the country’s VAT has resurfaced as some lawmakers push to reduce the rate back to its original 10 percent under Senate Bill 1152, also known as the VAT Reduction Act. By comparison, the Philippines currently imposes one of the highest VAT rates in Southeast Asia — Thailand’s is 7 percent, Malaysia’s is 5 percent and Indonesia’s is 11 percent.

A higher VAT not only leaves consumers with less disposable income, it also affects the competitiveness and cost structures for businesses, making the country less attractive for investment. The VAT Reduction Act seeks to change that by boosting GDP while also easing the burden on Filipino households, particularly low- and middle-income families who see a substantial portion of their earnings consumed by VAT every time they spend.

Supporters of the proposal argue that lowering the VAT rate will immediately increase household disposable income and stimulate consumption. With more money left in the hands of consumers, families could spend beyond basic necessities, reshaping consumption patterns and fueling demand across industries. The added purchasing power will reinforce the households’ role as the primary driver of the Philippine economy.

In theory, the reduction in VAT could even offset part of the government’s revenue loss as higher sales may improve business performance and potentially increase collections from other tax types. Supporters also highlight the public trust issue, arguing that allowing households to retain more of their income may be more efficient than relying on government redistribution programs that are often viewed as vulnerable to inefficiency or leakages.

On the other hand, the Department of Finance (DOF) stresses that rolling back VAT could lead to annual revenue loss of roughly 1 percent of GDP, or about P330 billion from 2026 to 2030. VAT accounts for 26.5 percent of total tax collections and nearly 29.9 percent of government revenues. For fiscal managers, a reduction could widen the budget deficit and likely force the government to borrow more, potentially raising debt, increasing interest payments and affecting the country’s credit rating.

The DOF cautions that while lowering VAT will reduce prices and increase household purchasing power, it could slow down fiscal consolidation efforts that aim to stabilize the country’s finances over the long sterm.

Beyond economics, the debate is also shaped by public sentiment. Issues surrounding corruption, inefficiency and misuse of funds have damaged public trust and influenced how citizens perceive taxation. For many households, VAT has become more than a consumption tax — it is a symbol of governance challenges. When taxpayers see reports of waste, fraud or mismanagement, the willingness to accept a high tax burden declines. Conversely, when revenues are used effectively, taxation can be perceived as a necessary contribution to national development.

If passed, the VAT rollback could mark a turning point in economic policy, one that reconsiders how the government balances revenue generation with household welfare. It could provide a breathing room for families, stimulate consumption, influence business confidence and strengthen the economy from the ground up.

However, this also raises questions about fiscal sustainability and the government’s ability to fund critical services. Policymakers must evaluate whether the potential short-term boost to spending outweighs the long-term implications for public finances and whether complementary reforms, such as improved tax administration, reduced leakages, or a broadened tax base are necessary. Strengthening transparency, improving service delivery and ensuring accountability may be as important as tax reform itself in restoring public confidence.

Ultimately, the VAT debate highlights the need for a balanced, evidence-based approach. Policymakers must weigh immediate household needs against long-term fiscal stability, considering how each option aligns with the country’s broader goals of inclusive growth, resilience and competitiveness. The question is not simply whether VAT should be reduced or maintained, but how any decision fits into a coherent, responsible and forward-looking economic strategy.

Whether the government chooses to retain the 12-percent rate or revert to 10 percent, the path forward should be grounded in credible analysis, realistic planning and transparent communication. As the discussion continues, the challenge for policymakers is to craft a policy approach that secures long-term fiscal health and also acknowledges the everyday realities faced by Filipino families who are affected by every price increase.

Source: Manila Times

BMI keeps 5.2% growth estimate

Fitch Solutions unit BMI has kept its 2026 growth forecast for the Philippines despite the last year’s miss as it expects public and private investments to recover.

BMI sees the Philippine economy expanding by 5.2% this year, unchanged from its earlier projection.

“For now, we are maintaining our 2026 growth forecast at 5.2%, but the lower 2025 base makes this a more pessimistic outlook,” it said in a report.

This is within the government’s 5%-6% growth target for the year.

Philippine gross domestic product (GDP) expanded by 3% in the fourth quarter, slower than 5.3% in the same period a year prior and the revised 3.9% print in the third quarter, the government reported last week.

This was the slowest quarterly print in nearly five years or since the 3.8% contraction in the first quarter of 2021. Outside of the coronavirus pandemic, this was the worst since the 1.8% growth recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009, or during the Global Financial Crisis.

This brought full-year 2025 GDP growth to 4.4%, below the government’s 5.5%-6.5% goal. This was slower than 2024’s 5.7% and was the weakest annual expansion since the 3.9% in 2011, counting out the 9.5% contraction in 2020 due to the pandemic.

Officials said tighter public spending and weak investor confidence due to the flood control scandal continued to drag growth.

BMI said it sees both public and private investments rebounding this year as the government works to ramp up spending and amid the lagged impact of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas’ (BSP) past rate cuts on demand.

“The government probably underspent its capital budget in 2025… Beyond rhetoric from government officials pledging catch-up capital spending, we have not seen any indication of when the Senate investigation into corruption will conclude or when delayed infrastructure projects will be restarted,” it said.

“We would, however, be surprised if policymakers allowed the probe to drag on public capex (capital expenditure) for much longer — a quick recovery in infrastructure spending is necessary to hit the government’s 5-6% growth target for 2026. Our best guess for now is that the government will make up for the underspending of the capital budget in H2 (second half) 2026, with the low base flattering GDP growth in H2.”

It added that household consumption may also rebound this year, with the peso’s weakness to increase the value of remittances from migrant Filipinos.

However, the country’s external sector could weaken as last year’s export strength was largely driven by frontloading ahead of higher tariffs and increased electronics demand due to the artificial intelligence (AI) boom — which are both expected to lose steam this year, BMI said.

“Early indicators are starting to reflect deteriorating external orders… The global semiconductor upcycle appears to have peaked, as firms reassess the returns on AI-driven investments. This will materially affect electronic exports — about 54% of Philippine exports. Accordingly, we expect export growth to moderate as frontloading tapers and the higher 2025 base will mechanically make strong year-on-year growth hard to sustain,” it said.

“Should there be continued delays to infrastructure spending, household spending and exports will not be enough to offset weaker public spending, posing downside risks to our forecast. Inflation may also run hotter than we forecast if oil prices get another boost from rising geopolitical risks, limiting the BSP’s room for rate cuts.”

BMI expects the Monetary Board (MB) to deliver 50 basis points (bps) in cuts this year.

For its part, Deutsche Bank Research said the “surprise” growth slowdown last quarter increases the odds of a sixth straight rate cut by the BSP this month.

“We think that a February rate cut from the BSP is now almost certainly ‘on the table,’” it said in a report.

“We also see a rising likelihood of another rate cut in H1  (first half) given the likely wider-than-expected negative output gap,” it added “We will refresh our view pending more up-to-date data from 2026, including inflation, government disbursements, and BSP’s guidance in the February MB meeting.”

BSP Governor Eli M. Remolona, Jr. said on Sunday that a cut is possible at their Feb. 19 policy review if the fourth-quarter GDP slowdown proves demand-driven.

“If we can help on the demand side and still keep inflation low, then of course we’ll help,” he said.

He added that they will continue to assess the available data and decide “one meeting at a time.”

The Monetary Board has slashed benchmark borrowing costs by 200 bps since August 2024, bringing the policy rate to 4.5%.

Source: Business World

Rules for big cash withdrawals tweaked

The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) said banks should apply enhanced due diligence (EDD) to cash withdrawals exceeding P500,000 on a per-customer—rather than per-transaction—basis, with reviews anchored on a depositor’s normal business activity.

In a memorandum signed on Feb. 6 by Governor Eli Remolona Jr., the central bank said the clarification was meant to ensure that due diligence checks do not unnecessarily delay legitimate transactions. Banks were also instructed to streamline procedures for customers and provide targeted training for branch staff to ensure consistent and effective implementation.

The guidance follows last year’s order requiring closer scrutiny of over-the-counter cash withdrawals above P500,000 to curb money-laundering risks tied to large-value transactions. Under the rules, customers seeking to withdraw more than that amount in cash need only present documents showing a legitimate purpose, such as a deed of sale or hospital bill, while withdrawals made through traceable, non-cash channels do not require additional documentation.

According to the BSP, EDD process must consider the customer’s risk profile, nature of business or operations, and transaction patterns. A streamlined process may be applied to bank-to-bank transactions, such as interbranch or interbank cash requirements or loan disbursements.

For cash payouts or withdrawals during declared calamities or emergencies, the BSP said certification from the head of agency may be obtained.

Meanwhile, more rigorous due diligence checks will be applied when transactions deviate from a customer’s expected behavior or present heightened risks.

Former Finance Secretary Cesar Purisima earlier called on local policymakers to adopt tougher curbs on cash transactions. He warned that the country’s reliance on envelopes and bags of banknotes has made it easier for corruption to thrive.

This, amid a widening probe into anomalous flood control projects, which implicated lawmakers, members of the Cabinet, government engineers and private contractors.

Since the start of its crackdown last year, the Anti-Money Laundering Council has obtained court approvals to freeze assets totaling P24.7 billion, believed to be connected to the massive corruption scandal.

Remolona had warned that the graft fallout could risk dragging the Philippines back onto the Financial Action Task Force’s “gray list”—a watch list the country had just exited in early 2025 after over three years of efforts to remedy gaps in its antimoney laundering and counterterrorism financing campaigns.

Source: Inquirer