Government unveils 10-yr. jobs masterplan

The Philippines government on Monday launched a 10-year employment masterplan, which is targeting to increase the labor force participation rate (LFPR) to 68.2% by 2034.

“This is a very ambitious plan. If you look at the targets, it’s simple, we want to raise our LFPR from 64% to 68%,” Department of Economy, Planning, and Development (DEPDev) Undersecretary Rosemarie G. Edillon told reporters.

“So, this is actually a big ask, especially since by 2035, the majority of the workforce will be coming from Gen Z and Gen Alpha. So, we actually need a big policy reform,” she added.

Launched by the DEPDev, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), and the Department of Labor and Employment, the Trabaho Para sa Bayan (TPB) Plan aims to strengthen and future-proof the country’s workforce.

Under the plan, the government set near-term and long-term initiatives aimed at addressing challenges faced by the local labor market, such as rapid digitalization, geopolitical tensions, climate change, and demographic shifts.

Ms. Edillon said that the country’s LFPR is the lowest among the Association of Southeast Asian Nation (ASEAN) countries.

“Taking out the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) years, our LFPR is about less than 65%, but for the other countries, it is actually in the high 60s. You have Vietnam over there with an LFPR in the high 70s,” she added.

Preliminary data from the Philippine Statistics Authority showed that LFPR in February was estimated at 64.5%. For the first two months, the average LFPR stood at 64.2%.

However, the new jobs masterplan did not indicate any targets on how many jobs will be created until 2034.

“The problem with having a target with respect to jobs is that it’s very difficult, especially since we are moving towards a framework for flexible work arrangements where it would be possible for you to hold more than one job,” said Ms. Edillon.

“We’re also moving towards having a framework for part-time jobs. So, it’s difficult [to see] how it will translate into the number of jobs,” she added.

Labor Secretary Bienvenido E. Laguesma said that there have been previous targets to create a million jobs.

“But this does not ensure there will be enough jobs created for the new entrants (to the labor market),” he said.

“It’s not that simple to say that we want to create one or two million jobs by a certain year. What we want to see is that every Filipino family will have a job,” he added.

The TPB Plan also set a target of decreasing the unemployment rate to 3% by 2034 from 3.8% in 2024 and the underemployment rate to 7-9% from 13.3% last year.

In addition, the masterplan also aims to increase the female LFPR to 59% by 2034, which Ms. Edillon said is the lowest in the ASEAN region.

“Ours is about 48.8%, while in Vietnam it is actually 72.5%. So can you just imagine how much more human capital we could add if we could actually increase the LFPR for women?” she added.

The TPB Plan is also targeting to improve the country’s domestic industry diversification and production, as well as export complexity.

Citing the Global Innovation Index, Ms. Edillon said that the two factors measure the level of sophistication of the economy.

“That is actually the goal, that we will be a more competitive country before 2034. So that is actually the goal of the National Innovation Agenda and Strategy Document,” she added.

The TPB Plan outlines priority strategies that aim to address labor demand, supply, and governance, as well as how to future-proof labor demand, supply, and governance.

Strategies to ensure labor demand include expansion of market access, encouraging investments in priority sectors, ensuring ease of doing business, establishment of a dynamic innovation ecosystem, and promotion of technology adoption and enterprise-based education and training.

To improve labor supply, the TPB Plan recognized the need to expand lifelong learning opportunities, upgrade the design of skills training programs, enhance overseas Filipino reintegration programs, and increase program take-up among disadvantaged sectors.

Meanwhile, the TPB also cited 18 policy recommendations, which are seen to create an “inclusive and dynamic labor market environment.”

These policies include the Konektadong Pinoy bill, the Lifelong Learning Development Bill, tax incentives for employees on a work-from-home program, the Freelancers’ Protection Act, and the Amendment of the Maternity Leave Law, among others.

Source: Business World

19M illiterate Filipinos should jolt authorities to prioritize education

A report showing that about 19 million Filipino high school and senior high school graduates are illiterate should be considered as a “national emergency” and prompt authorities to prioritize education reforms, a congressman said.

Around 18.9 million Filipinos who completed secondary education from 2019 to 2024 may be considered illiterate, as they struggle to read and comprehend a simple story, according to a Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) report discussed in a Senate hearing on Wednesday.

“This is not just a crisis — it’s a national emergency,” Party-list Rep. France L. Castro said in a statement. “When one out of five senior high school graduates cannot comprehend a simple story despite years of schooling, we are looking at a systemic failure that threatens our country’s future.”

A 2022 World Bank report showed that nine of 10 Filipinos are unable to read and understand age-appropriate text at age 10.

“It’s alarming that despite the K-12 program, millions of young Filipinos still struggle to understand what they read,” Ms. Castro said.

A new curriculum, introduced in August 2023, sought to streamline learners’ education by focusing on reading, literacy, and numeracy in the first three schooling years of a student.

In 2024, Education Secretary Juan Edgardo M. Angara said the curriculum, launched by Vice-President Sara Duterte-Carpio during her stint as education chief, will continue to be revised based on the experience of teachers and students.

The Philippine government’s failure to ensure a sufficient budget to the education sector have left schools underfunded and teachers with inadequate salaries, Antonio L. Tinio, a party-list nominee in the midterm elections, said in the same statement.

“The government has consistently failed to meet the UN-recommended education budget allocation of 6% of GDP,” he said in Filipino. “The truth is simple: if investment in education is lacking, teachers and education support personnel receive inadequate salaries, and in turn, students learn less.”

The Philippines only allocated 3.6% of its GDP to education in 2022 according to World Bank data, below the 4-6% benchmark set by the Incheon Declaration.

“We need to double our current education budget to address classroom shortages, hire more qualified teachers, increase the salaries of teachers and education support personnel, provide quality learning materials, and implement effective literacy interventions,” said Ms. Castro.

In 2025, the combined budget of the Department of Education, Commission on Higher Education, Technical Education and Skills Development Authority, and state universities and colleges stood at P913.3 billion.

Meanwhile, an education advocacy group on Thursday said that political candidates for this year’s midterm election should prioritize education in their policy agenda.

“It is time to rise above politics and champion education. We urge the candidates to present concrete plans and real solutions that tackle the learning crisis, workforce readiness, and systemic reforms,” Philippine Business for Education Executive Director Hanibal Camua said in a separate statement.

“Education agencies cannot fix this crisis alone — and without bold, sustained support from elected leaders at every level of government, our most critical goals will remain out of reach,” he added.

Source: Business World

Should Airbnbs Be Banned In Tourist Destinations

The temptation to ban short-term rentals is strong. But cities would do better to step up regulation.

The Predicament

Talk to any resident of a world city popular with visitors, and two complaints inevitably come up: Rents are too high, and there are too many tourists.

It’s tempting (and, data suggest, not unjustified) to place some of the blame for these woes on Airbnb Inc., Vrbo and other websites that facilitate short-term rentals. Critics accuse them of reducing the supply of available homes and saturating popular neighborhoods with wild partygoers. Shops catering to these visitors end up elbowing out other smaller businesses, making daily life even harder for locals.

In response, many cities have already introduced restrictions on short-term rentals, with some moving toward total bans. Barcelona requires property owners to apply for a tourist license for rentals of fewer than 31 days. Earlier this year, authorities there announced they would stop issuing licenses and not renew existing ones until after November 2028. Others are following suit: In September, residents in Budapest’s sixth district narrowly voted in favor of a total ban that would take effect in 2026.

But bans also penalize city residents and visitors, including short-stay hosts conscientiously trying to follow rules and be good neighbors and guests who mind their manners. Is there a compromise that enshrines the ben­efits of short-term stays without driving up costs and frustrations for year-round residents?

The Case For

Because renting out homes by the day is often more profitable than by the month, Airbnb and its ilk are an irresistible draw for landlords. Critics say the proliferation of short-stay listings leaves prospective tenants chasing a dwindling number of long-term rentals, jacking up prices and pushing out those who can no longer afford them.

A 2018 study by New York City’s comptroller found that whenever the number of short-stay listings in a given area increased 1%, average rents in that neighborhood rose 1.6%. The spread of Airbnb and competitors, the study said, was responsible for 9.2% of all annual NYC rent increases from 2009 to 2016.

The Booming Short-Stay Market

To limit this impact, cities ­including New York have placed restrictions on short-term stays. But enforcement is a challenge. A 2017 study of publicly available agreements found that Airbnb and other platforms rarely provided exact addresses for dwellings to cities seeking to monitor locations. Even in cases where rule-­breaking can be proven, hosts often go unpunished. According to a 2022 study, the city of Los Angeles fined or sent warning letters to only a third of the illegal listings detectable within the city that year.

City governments might be more tolerant of short-term rentals if there were a clear economic case. But studies cited by the Economic Policy Institute found they jeopardize revenue flowing into municipal coffers because the recording and implementing of tax obligations from short-stay hosts are less comprehensive than for hotels, partly because some local agreements cede responsibility in this area to the short-stay platforms themselves.

There are also concerns that short-term rentals leave travelers more exposed to scams and other types of harm, compared with hotel stays. Then there’s the nuisance factor: Barcelona’s Airbnb ban comes after widespread public protest in the city against antisocial behavior from tourists, notably late-night noise from tenants of short-stay lettings. Add it all up, and it’s no surprise that many city leaders are contemplating wholesale bans, rather than more stringent regulations.

The Case Against

Airbnb and its competitors may be unfairly taking heat for housing crises that are largely not of their own making. When a country such as the UK would need to build another city the size of London to satisfy its current housing needs, it’s clearly insufficient home-building, rather than tourism trends, that’s to blame. There are also tentative signs that curbs on short-term stays may not be having the desired effect on easing long-term rental costs—and not just because of a lack of enforcement. In September 2023, New York City banned the renting of entire units for fewer than 30 days. (Spare rooms within homes permanently occupied by hosts were exempted from the rule.) One year on, many apartments previously offered for short stays have simply shifted to medium-length stays of more than 30 days, a market that’s even less regulated, while the modest rent decreases observed since then have been attributed to other factors.

“As we have seen in New York City, short-term rental bans do not alleviate housing challenges,” Theo Yedinsky, Airbnb’s vice president for public policy, said in a statement, “only benefitting large hotel chains that rapidly increase their rates. Airbnb has always welcomed reasonable regulations that balance the needs of communities with the ability of residents to earn additional income.”

It’s also important to note that not all Airbnb listings are suitable, or even viable, for full-time rental. Beach or winter sports resorts, for example, commonly have apartment buildings that were always intended as seasonal housing. Additionally, even if most vacation apartments are run by hosts with multiple listings, comprehensive bans penalize ­single-listing hosts who rely on the platforms to supplement their income.

The Common Ground

Although no city appears to have cracked the code on controlling short-term stays, most could do a better job of regulating them. Making sure hosts register their dwellings through a licensing system can make for a safer service, where tax rev­enue is also easier to collect.

Some city authorities say that for full enforcement of existing rules, they would need access to a more robust database that allows cities to click on a short-stay listing, trace it to a specific address and owner, then see how much it has been occupied across all platforms.

Airbnb has been working more closely with cities to address these concerns, moving in the direction of greater transparency. For instance, the company introduced the Airbnb City Portal in 2020, which makes it easier to check listings against licenses.

Airbnb is also involved in projects such as the Airbnb Housing Council that promote affordable housing in urban communities. “We have successfully worked with governments around the world to enforce proportionate local STR regulations,” Yedinsky said in his statement, “and believe cities should address the needs of their individual neighborhoods prescriptively as a more effective way to regulate.”

There are city leaders who say that Airbnb has been a benefit and that current restrictions are working. Rui Moreira, mayor of Porto, Portugal’s second-­biggest city and a popular tourist destination, says recent constraints placed on the number of Airbnbs permitted in its most popular neighborhoods have proved effective, encouraging hosted apartments to spread out from the city core. That’s helped spur the economic revival of run-down areas that might otherwise struggle to find funding, he says.

Source: Bloomberg