Results-as-a-Service: The next evolution in business

We are entering an era where instant results are no longer a luxury but a necessity. Businesses and consumers alike demand speed, efficiency, and guaranteed outcomes, leading to a fundamental shift in how services are delivered. Where Software-as-a-service (SaaS) revolutionized software access and Infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) and Platform-as-a-service (PaaS) streamlined IT operations, the next evolution is here: Results-as-a-service (RaaS).

Unlike traditional service models that provide tools and infrastructure, RaaS is built entirely around delivering measurable and guaranteed outcomes. Instead of paying for subscriptions, software, or support with no guaranteed success, companies now pay only for results — whether that's qualified leads, cybersecurity protection, AI-driven insights or business growth. This shift is redefining industries, ensuring that businesses invest in performance-driven solutions rather than uncertain processes.

At its core, RaaS is outcome-based. Businesses no longer need to invest in tools, technology or expertise; instead, they partner with providers who guarantee specific results. This model creates an alignment of incentives, where service providers are as committed to success as their clients — an answer to one's skin in the game.

Imagine RaaS happening in key business areas, such as sales and marketing, cybersecurity, and AI-powered decision-making. For the first one, traditional agencies charge for campaigns regardless of performance. In contrast, RaaS marketing models focus on delivering actual sales or leads, ensuring companies only pay for tangible revenue growth.

For cybersecurity, instead of purchasing software and hiring IT teams, businesses can opt for RaaS-based cybersecurity, where they only pay if threats are prevented or resolved. Finally, companies can leverage AI-driven insights without buying expensive software. They simply pay for actionable recommendations and successful implementations. Companies are increasingly getting into this model.

Scorpion, a marketing and lead generation RaaS provider, offers digital marketing for businesses in law, health care and home services. Instead of paying for ad placements or marketing tools, businesses pay based on the actual leads and revenue generated.

DoNotPay offers AI-powered legal services that help users dispute parking tickets, cancel subscriptions and resolve small claims cases. Instead of charging for software access, users pay only when they successfully resolve a case, making it a prime example of legal RaaS. Mobavenue, an AdTech company focusing on acquiring relevant users through acquisition or retargeting, only charges per successful app download, for example.

The adoption of RaaS brings several significant benefits for businesses. One of the primary advantages is cost efficiency; by paying only for results rather than investing in tools or services upfront, organizations can allocate their resources more effectively.

This model allows companies to concentrate on their core competencies while outsourcing non-core functions to specialized providers, enhancing their overall focus. Additionally, RaaS facilitates scalability, enabling businesses to expand their operations without the burden of substantial upfront investments in technology or personnel.

Furthermore, RaaS improves decision-making by providing access to real-time data and analytics from partners, allowing organizations to make informed decisions quickly. This model also offers flexibility, as businesses can adapt their strategies based on performance metrics supplied by RaaS solutions.

However, while the benefits of RaaS are compelling, organizations must also navigate potential challenges. One concern is the dependency on external providers for critical functions, which can create vulnerabilities if those partnerships falter. Quality control is another important consideration; ensuring that service providers consistently meet agreed-upon outcomes necessitates robust oversight mechanisms. Additionally, sharing sensitive data with external partners raises significant concerns regarding privacy and security.

As industries continue to evolve toward RaaS models, both businesses and employees must embrace this transformation. The emphasis on measurable outcomes over traditional service models represents a substantial shift in how success is defined in the marketplace.

The rise of RaaS signifies a fundamental change in business operations — one that prioritizes results over processes. As organizations navigate this new landscape, they must remain agile and innovative while aligning their strategies with the principles of performance-driven success. Ultimately, the future belongs to those who can adapt to this new paradigm and leverage it for sustainable growth and competitive advantage.

As RaaS gains momentum, employees must adapt or risk obsolescence. This model shifts job roles from task execution to strategic thinking and results-driven contributions. Those who thrive in a RaaS-driven economy will adopt a performance mindset, develop versatile skill sets, and commit to lifelong learning, given the need to stay ahead of industry trends and emerging technologies.

The transition to RaaS marks a new era in business — one where success is measured not by tools or processes but by tangible, real-world impact. As industries shift toward this model, both businesses and employees must embrace the change, innovate and align themselves with the future of results-based success.

Source: Manila Times

Third-Party Adverse Possessor in Philippine Law

In Philippine property law, adverse possession refers to a legal principle where a person (the possessor) who is not the owner of a property may eventually acquire ownership through continuous, open, and exclusive possession of the land for a prescribed period.

This is based on the legal doctrine of "prescription" under the Civil Code of the Philippines.

Third-Party Adverse Possessor Defined

A third-party adverse possessor is a person who possesses a property without the consent of the owner and without any valid legal title, claiming ownership in a way that is:

• Public – Openly using the land as if they were the owner

• Notorious – Known to the community or the original owner

• Exclusive – No other party is using the land

• Continuous and Uninterrupted – Possession must last for the legally required period

This third-party possessor is different from someone who originally had permission to use the land (e.g., a lessee or tenant).

Legal Period for Adverse Possession in the Philippines

Under Article 1137 of the Civil Code:

• If the land is private property, adverse possession must be for 30 years, regardless of whether the owner was aware.

• If the land was previously public property but became private through possession, the period is 10 years if the possessor has a "just title" and in good faith.

Example Scenario of Third-Party Adverse Possession

Case: Juan and Maria’s Disputed Lot

1. Original Ownership – Maria owns a 1,000 sqm lot in Pangasinan but has not visited or used it for 40 years.

2. Adverse Possession Begins – In 1984, Juan, a farmer with no legal claim to the land, starts living on and cultivating it, believing it is abandoned.

3. Notorious and Continuous Possession – Juan builds a house, plants crops, and pays real property taxes, openly treating it as his own for 30+ years.

4. Ownership Claim – In 2024, Maria’s heirs try to reclaim the land, but Juan argues that he now owns it through acquisitive prescription.

Legal Outcome: Since Juan has adversely possessed the land for more than 30 years, he can file for ownership under extraordinary prescription, even though he had no title when he took possession.

To conclude:

A third-party adverse possessor is someone with no legal right or title to a property but who occupies it as an owner for the required period. If the possession meets the legal requirements, ownership can be transferred through acquisitive prescription.

The rightful owner must assert their rights within the prescriptive period, or risk losing ownership.

Source: Ziggurat Real Estate

When are you considered as common partners?

Question: I am still married with my ex husband and now living together with my new partner and we already have a baby, can we be considered as common partners?

In the Philippines, even if you are separated from your husband and living with a new partner, you cannot be legally considered as "common-law partners" because your previous marriage is still valid. Here’s why:

1. Legal Status Under Philippine Law

• Since the Philippines does not have divorce (except for Muslims), you are still legally married to your husband unless:

  • You get an annulment or

  • You file for legal separation (though this does not allow remarriage).

• Because of this, your new relationship is not legally recognized as a common-law partnership under Philippine law.

2. What About "Common-Law" in Practice?

• In practice, some people in the Philippines refer to their live-in partners as common-law spouses, especially if they have a child together.

• However, legally speaking, you are not considered a common-law spouse since you are still married to someone else.

3. Possible Legal Implications

• Bigamy Risk – If you attempt to remarry without an annulment, it could be considered bigamy, a criminal offense.

• Property Issues – Any assets you acquire while still married may still be considered conjugal property with your legal husband.

• Child’s Status – Your baby is considered illegitimate under Philippine law because you are still married to someone else. However, you can legitimize the child if you and your new partner get married after annulment.

What Can You Do?

If you want legal security for your new family, you may want to consider:

✅ Annulment – If your marriage qualifies for annulment, this is the only way you can legally be free.

✅ Legal Documents for Your Child – You can ensure your baby’s birth certificate lists the father’s name and arrange legal recognition.

source: Ziggurat Real Estate