top of page

Giving Up on Homeownership Can Hurt You in the Long Run

  • Writer: Ziggurat Realestatecorp
    Ziggurat Realestatecorp
  • Mar 3
  • 3 min read

For generations, homeownership has been a cornerstone of the American Dream. Owning a home represents stability, a way to build credit, and a powerful path to long-term wealth through equity.


But today, that dream feels increasingly out of reach.


As home prices in the United States continue to outpace wage growth, more young Americans are starting to question whether they will ever own a home at all.


A Growing Sense of Hopelessness


The numbers tell a concerning story.

  • A 2022 survey by Apartment List found that nearly 25% of millennials expect to rent forever — almost double the 13% recorded in 2018.

  • A 2024 Harris Poll revealed that 42% of U.S. adults — and nearly half of Gen Z — agree with the statement:“No matter how hard I work, I will never be able to afford a home I really love.”

That’s not just a housing issue. It’s a psychological shift with potentially long-term economic consequences.


What Happens When People Stop Believing?


Economists studying this trend wanted to understand how fading hopes of homeownership might shape financial behavior over a lifetime.


To explore this, researchers built a mathematical model simulating household financial decisions from age 20 to 75. The model incorporated:


  • Wage growth and volatility

  • Rising home prices

  • Savings patterns

  • Mortgage debt

  • Risk tolerance

  • Desire to pass wealth to children


Using real-world data from the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances and U.S. Census data, they compared generations and projected outcomes.

The findings were striking.


Roughly 84% of people born in 1950 eventually purchased a home — closely matching real Census data.

But only 74% of those born in 1990 are expected to reach that milestone.

That 10-percentage-point drop may seem modest — but its ripple effects are profound.


The Fork in the Road at Age 20


The research compared two hypothetical 20-year-old renters who start with similar financial resources.


The Hopeful Renter

This individual believes homeownership is achievable. As a result, they:

  • Save aggressively

  • Work harder

  • Accumulate wealth steadily

  • Eventually purchase a home

  • Continue building equity and savings into later life


The Discouraged Renter

This individual sees homeownership as unlikely. Over time, they:

  • Save less

  • Consume more relative to their wealth

  • Take riskier financial bets

  • Accumulate little to no assets

  • Live largely paycheck to paycheck


The divergence begins early — when the decision to save for a house is either embraced or abandoned. That single turning point can lead to enormous differences in lifetime wealth.



Riskier Bets and Reduced Work Effort


When housing feels unattainable, people may redirect their financial energy elsewhere.

Researchers observed that renters with a net worth below $300,000 are significantly more likely than comparable homeowners to invest in cryptocurrencies. Among wealthier Americans, homeowners and renters invest in crypto at similar rates. But among lower-net-worth households, renters are far more likely to take these speculative risks.


It may be an attempt to “gamble” back into the housing market.


Work behavior also shifts.


Among homeowners, only about 2% to 3% report reduced work effort, regardless of wealth level. The same holds for high-net-worth renters.

But among renters with lower net worth, the share reporting lower work effort rises to 4% to 6%.


While critics sometimes label these patterns as laziness or “quiet quitting,” the research suggests a deeper structural explanation: when long-term incentives fade, behavior changes.


If working harder no longer brings you closer to buying a home, motivation weakens.


The Broader Economic Impact


The consequences extend beyond individual households.

The model suggests that people who give up on homeownership may:

  • Work fewer hours

  • Earn less income

  • Pay less in taxes

  • Contribute less to overall economic productivity


Over time, this could shift fiscal burdens and reduce economic growth.

The housing affordability crisis isn’t just about ownership rates — it may influence national productivity and wealth formation.



Can Policy Restore Hope?


Policymakers have proposed various solutions to address affordability, including mortgage bond stimulus programs and efforts to increase housing supply.


While the effectiveness of specific proposals remains debated, the research suggests one key insight: Timing matters.


If financial support reaches households before they give up, it may reinforce saving behavior and long-term planning. But once discouragement sets in and habits change, reversing course becomes much more difficult.


In other words, hope itself may be a critical economic asset.


The Bigger Picture


Forgoing homeownership can be a rational response to skyrocketing prices. Saving for years only to watch homes become even more unaffordable is discouraging.


But the long-term behavioral effects of giving up may be far more costly than many realize.


Homeownership has traditionally served as a powerful anchor for disciplined saving, career ambition, and wealth building. When that anchor disappears, financial trajectories can shift dramatically.


The housing affordability crisis may not only reshape who owns homes — it may reshape how an entire generation works, saves, invests, and builds wealth.

And that could have consequences lasting far beyond the housing market itself.


Source: Bloomberg

Comments


© Copyright 2018 by Ziggurat Real Estate Corp. All Rights Reserved.

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Instagram
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • flipboard_mrsw
  • RSS
bottom of page